"Azota kb. 30 ilyen terület tudomànyosan elfogadott, munkàssàga elismerésre és folytatàsra talàlt...."

szó sincs tudományos elfogadásról.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridology#Scientific_research_into_iridology

Well controlled scientific evaluation of iridology has shown entirely negative results, with all rigorous double blinded tests failing to find any statistical significance to its claims.

The iridologists were not able to identify correctly which patients had gall bladder problems and which had healthy gall bladders. For example one of iridologists diagnosed 49% of the patients with gall stones as having them and 51% as not having them. He diagnosed 51% of the control group as having gall bladder problems and 49% as not. Dr Knipschild concluded: "this study showed that iridology is not a useful diagnostic aid.