És itt egy pár adat a tipikus buta emberekre, buta feiminstárka és elvakult feministákra jellmező torzításról mikor erőszekról erőszekossgról van szó a nemek közt. gyakorlatilaga feministák a közhelyekben vakon hívő birkák segítségével sunyi és hazug módon deminzálták a ffiakat. Az egész leginkább a komunizmushoz hasonló torz rendszerek propagandájára emlékeztet. Szerintem szégyenteljes, sokszor szándékos csalás és hazugság ami jellemző a frusztrált vérfeminsta rétegre.



Note that the results of Mechem and others (1999), Ernst and others (1997), and Dr. Svoren, are basically consistent with the results of Straus and Gelles (1986, p. 470) and Straus and Kantor (1994) shown in Table 7.

John Maguire recently detailed how a 1987 Canadian study published in the Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science in 1989 simply ignored data collected from men that, in fact, show that women in the survey are more violent than the men. In his article, Maguire points out that:

"Women are just as violent to their spouses as men, and they are almost three times more likely to initiate violence in a relationship, according to a new Canadian study, as reported in the National Post.

Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the study, however, is the source of the data — a 1987 survey of 705 Alberta men and women that reported how often males hit their spouses.

Although women were asked the same questions as men in 1987, their answers were never published until now. When the original study was published in the Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science in 1989, it was taken up by feminist groups as evidence of the epidemic of violence against women.

It was cited extensively in a 1990 House of Commons committee report 'The War Against Women,' which ultimately led Brian Mulroney, the former prime minister, to call a two-year $10-million national inquiry into violence against women, according to the National Post.

The inquiry's 460-page report [in 1989] made 494 recommendations aimed at changing attitudes in governments, police departments, courts, hospitals and churches. It also led to a torrent of lurid news features about battered women."

and Canadian laws were influenced or enacted by a survey that totally suppressed male data.

When the data from males were finally included in 1999, Maguire reports that:

"The study shows roughly that 10.8% of men in the survey pushed, grabbed or threw objects at their spouses in the previous year, while 2.5% committed more severe acts, such as choking, kicking or using a weapon.

By contrast, 12.4% of women committed acts of minor violence and 4.7% committed severe violence.

The violence is seldom one-sided. Of those surveyed, 52% of women and 62% of men reported that both partners were violent.

When questioned about who initiated the most severe conflicts, 67% of women believed they had started it; only 26% believed it was their male spouse."

but the complete results have generally been met with resounding silence.

Erin Pizzey discusses the same bias in a 1998 British Medical Association (BMA) survey:

"...in Islington provided the information that 571 women and 429 men were asked about domestic violence. The result of questioning the 571 women shows that one in three of them had reported domestic violence, and a quarter of the women had been forced to have sex against their will. There is no mention in the BMA report of any result from the questioning of the 429 men. Upon further research we find that the men were questioned, but only about whether or not they had physically or sexually abused women. The researchers failed to ask if they considered themselves victims of domestic violence."

If the NCADV and other feminist estimates are hopelessly biased, and households rarely think that a crime of domestic violence has been committed in their residence, what are the real values for incidents of family violence in the United States?